This study examines human-wildlife conflict (HWC) and poaching in two Namibian conservancies, highlighting the importance of integrating local knowledge into conservation strategies. Using mixed methods, researchers assessed how communities perceive risks, which species are most vulnerable (elephants, buffalo, hippos, kudu), and the economic and ecological roles of wildlife. Findings revealed a gap between perceived and actual data, underscoring the value of local insight in shaping effective management. While wildlife contributes significantly to conservancy revenue—often through regulated hunting—conflicts and poaching can lead to both economic and ecological loss. When communities feel excluded from fair benefit-sharing, support for conservation weakens, increasing poaching risks. To ensure long-term sustainability, the study recommends engaging communities, targeting high-risk species, distributing benefits more equitably and improving communication around wildlife risks. When managed fairly and transparently, regulated hunting can fund conservation, reduce conflict and align community interests with wildlife protection.
