Trophy hunting generates controversy over its conservation benefits, ethical concerns, and economic contributions. Proponents argue it funds conservation and supports local economies, while critics cite the decline of endangered species, potential corruption, and ethical objections to killing animals for sport.
International laws, such as CITES and the US ESA, regulate trophy hunting. ESA governs imports, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issues import permits. Congress could regulate imports, fund conservation, monitor hunting practices, create uniform permit standards, mandate public access to permits, and establish a third-party certification system for hunting operations.
Alternatives to trophy hunting, such as wildlife viewing and tourism, or captive hunting on game ranches, exist. Captive hunting is debated for its impact on fair chase hunting and conservation.
